Doctoral Networks - MSCA-NET

30 June 2022

0 Comments

Are “Reference identifier” and ”Type of identifier” related to a separate/ additional database ID and does it relate to Part B?

The reference identifier in the researchers table in part A of the proposal corresponds to a unique code that a researcher can use to ...

30 June 2022

0 Comments

Are there any templates which outline procedures for conflict resolution in MSCA consortia? Specifically, procedures for how participants in the network, at different levels, can raise complaints and how those complaints need to be handled in a formal capacity?

There are no such templates beyond the standard consortium agreement template, such as the one provided by DESCA (https://www.desca-agreement.eu/desca-model-consortium-agreement/).

1 June 2022

0 Comments

How likely it is that a proposal on the reserve list will be funded? Is this less common in consortia type of projects (versus the PF for example)?

The number of funded DN projects from the reserve list is normally lower than these from the PF reserve list.

1 June 2022

0 Comments

What does “multiple recruitment” mean?

“Multiple recruitment” means that the researcher has several work contracts during the fellowship. For example, during the first half of the fellowship they have ...

1 June 2022

0 Comments

How can applicants approach the network organisation in Document 2 of the part B template, sections 4 and 5, and what should be the level of details, since this part has no page limits?

Applicants may describe the network organisation in one and up to two pages, for sections 4 and 5 together, based on the consortium size ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

How are evaluators going to evaluate the impact criterion? Do the applicants need to provide some kind of validation mechanism?

When talking about impact, this is prospective, it is in the future, assuming that the project is successful and that it achieves everything that ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Are there any examples or guidance regarding possible impacts in projects in the Social Sciences and Humanities areas?

There are different scientific panels and proposals are ranked within their scientific panel. Proposals in some panels are more STEM-oriented and would have a ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Are there examples of linked associated partners and the added benefit for them to participate in an MSCA action when they are not able to claim costs?

The first thing to note is, that even though they cannot directly claim costs, it does not mean that they cannot indirectly receive some ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

In which part of the proposal Open Science aspects should be included?

All Open Science aspects are moved under Excellence in the methodology. Open Access should not be described under Impact and Dissemination as it is ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Are both beneficiaries AND associated partners from Member States and Associated Countries, who meet the criteria of public bodies, required to have a published GEP by the time of GA signature?

This requirement should be applicable to beneficiaries and not to associated partners.

FAQ Category: Doctoral Networks

Are “Reference identifier” and ”Type of identifier” related to a separate/ additional database ID and does it relate to Part B?

Are there any templates which outline procedures for conflict resolution in MSCA consortia? Specifically, procedures for how participants in the network, at different levels, can raise complaints and how those complaints need to be handled in a formal capacity?

How likely it is that a proposal on the reserve list will be funded? Is this less common in consortia type of projects (versus the PF for example)?

What does “multiple recruitment” mean?

How can applicants approach the network organisation in Document 2 of the part B template, sections 4 and 5, and what should be the level of details, since this part has no page limits?

How are evaluators going to evaluate the impact criterion? Do the applicants need to provide some kind of validation mechanism?

Are there any examples or guidance regarding possible impacts in projects in the Social Sciences and Humanities areas?

Are there examples of linked associated partners and the added benefit for them to participate in an MSCA action when they are not able to claim costs?

In which part of the proposal Open Science aspects should be included?

Are both beneficiaries AND associated partners from Member States and Associated Countries, who meet the criteria of public bodies, required to have a published GEP by the time of GA signature?

MSCA-NET Contact

Latest Tweets