Postdoctoral Fellowships - MSCA-NET

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Are there examples of linked associated partners and the added benefit for them to participate in an MSCA action when they are not able to claim costs?

The first thing to note is, that even though they cannot directly claim costs, it does not mean that they cannot indirectly receive some ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

In which part of the proposal Open Science aspects should be included?

All Open Science aspects are moved under Excellence in the methodology. Open Access should not be described under Impact and Dissemination as it is ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Are both beneficiaries AND associated partners from Member States and Associated Countries, who meet the criteria of public bodies, required to have a published GEP by the time of GA signature?

This requirement should be applicable to beneficiaries and not to associated partners.

19 May 2022

0 Comments

When does the checking of the GEPs happen?

For calls with deadlines in 2022 and beyond, once a project proposal is selected for funding following evaluations, consortium partners concerned by the eligibility ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Should GEPs be ready by call closure for calls with a deadline in 2022?

For calls with deadlines in 2022 and beyond, once a project proposal is selected for funding following evaluations, consortium partners concerned by the eligibility ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

What would be the recommendation for PF applicants regarding Open Science?

Open Science practices should be covered under sub-criterion 1.2. where applicants should explain briefly how appropriate open science practices are implemented as an integral ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Is it possible that the third country host is legally linked to the beneficiary?

The entity established in a non-associated Third Country hosting the outgoing phase must be an associated partner (i.e. which participates in the action but ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Are impact expectations aligned with the Key Pathways to Impact from Horizon Europe?

The concept of Key Pathways to Impact is not so relevant for PF. From the PF point of view, being a mono-beneficiary action with ...

19 May 2022

0 Comments

How is independent publishing without an official academic appointment taken into account for the 8 years maximum research experience?

Independent publishing is not considered as research experience and, hence, does not affect the calculation of the 8-year rule.

19 May 2022

0 Comments

Is there a need to include detailed activities (for example in the form of a Work Package) for the non-academic placement?

There is no need for detailed work plan for the non-academic placement, though it must be mentioned in the Gantt chart. The rationale and ...

FAQ Category: Postdoctoral Fellowships

Are there examples of linked associated partners and the added benefit for them to participate in an MSCA action when they are not able to claim costs?

In which part of the proposal Open Science aspects should be included?

Are both beneficiaries AND associated partners from Member States and Associated Countries, who meet the criteria of public bodies, required to have a published GEP by the time of GA signature?

When does the checking of the GEPs happen?

Should GEPs be ready by call closure for calls with a deadline in 2022?

What would be the recommendation for PF applicants regarding Open Science?

Is it possible that the third country host is legally linked to the beneficiary?

Are impact expectations aligned with the Key Pathways to Impact from Horizon Europe?

How is independent publishing without an official academic appointment taken into account for the 8 years maximum research experience?

Is there a need to include detailed activities (for example in the form of a Work Package) for the non-academic placement?

MSCA-NET Contact

Latest Tweets